Search for: All records

An unusual earthquake swarm began in December 2021 between the towns of Elgin and Lugoff in South Carolina, United States. This area is characterized by historically low seismicity, but by April 2024 it has experienced 97 small earthquakes listed in the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) catalog, presenting a unique opportunity to investigate the dynamics of earthquake swarms in stable continental regions. These events are located in a north–south diffuse trend, cross cutting the East Piedmont fault system, a Late Paleozoic dextral strike-slip fault; however, the location uncertainties were too large to reveal any obvious structure. Starting from October 2022, we deployed 86 Smartsolo 5-Hz three-component seismic nodes for four months in the direct vicinity of the Elgin swarm. Using a combination of deep learning and match filter techniques for event detection, and double-difference relocation method for precise earthquake locations, we obtain up to 100 high-resolution microearthquake locations, as compared with four events listed in the USGS catalog for the deployment period. In our improved catalog, we report significantly smaller magnitudes in comparison to those listed in the USGS catalog, with a local magnitude ranging from −2.17 to 2.54 and achieving a magnitude of completeness at −0.20. The relocated catalog outlined a single-fault plane of nearly north–south strike and west dipping, inconsistent with either known fault strikes or the magnetic anomalies in this region. We also determine focal mechanism solutions for selected events in this swarm sequence, which shows mainly strike-slip faulting with nodal planes aligning with the north–south-striking seismic cluster. Our relocated catalog can be used to constrain the location of other swarm events outside the nodal recording period and provide a robust benchmark data set for further analysis of the swarm sequence. 

Abstract The devastating 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence in southeastern Türkiye started with a moment magnitude (Mw) 7.8 earthquake, for which the initial rupture broke the Sakçagöz segment near Nurdağı and then jumped into a bilateral rupture along multiple segments of the Eastern Anatolian fault zone (EAFZ). This complicated rupture was followed nine hours later by an Mw 7.6 event near Ekinözü. To better understand the spatiotemporal evolution of aftershocks, site amplification, and the structural and tectonic framework of the EAFZ in this diffuse triple junction, we deployed a dense seismometer array covering both aftershock zones for nearly four months. The main Eastern Anatolian Seismic Temporary (EAST) array includes 125 nodal, 10 broadband, and 6 strong-motion seismic stations distributed around the rupture zone. An additional linear array of 73 nodal stations was also installed across the Pazarcık segment of the EAFZ and the Sakçagöz segment near the Mw 7.8 epicenter to record fault-zone waves for ∼30 days. This article shows example recordings and the EAST array geometry, preliminary research results, and the metadata related to all of the stations in this array. A deep-learning-based phase picking for one month of continuous recording yielded millions of seismic phase readings and tens of thousands of aftershock locations after phase associations. We also give examples of both local and teleseismic waveforms recorded by the nodal arrays, which can be used for subsequent high-resolution earthquake relocation, imaging of crustal structures, and fault-zone imaging. 

Abstract The 1886 magnitude ∼7 Summerville, South Carolina, earthquake was the largest recorded on the east coast of the United States. A better understanding of this earthquake would allow for an improved evaluation of the intraplate seismic hazard in this region. However, its source fault structure remains unclear. Starting in May 2021, a temporary 19-station short-period seismic network was deployed in the Summerville region. Here, we present our scientific motivation, station geometry, and quality of the recorded seismic data. We also show preliminary results of microearthquake detections and relocations using recordings from both our temporary and four permanent stations in the region. Starting with 52 template events, including two magnitude ∼3 events on 27 September 2021, we perform a matched filter detection with the one year of continuous data, resulting in a catalog of 181 total events. We then determine precise relative locations of a portion of these events using differential travel-time relocation methods, and compare the results with relocation results of 269 events from a previous seismic deployment in 2011–2012. We also determine focal mechanism solutions for three events from 27 September 2021 with magnitudes 2.0, 3.1, and 3.3, and infer their fault planes. Our relocation results show a south-striking west-dipping zone in the southern seismicity cluster, which is consistent with the thrust focal mechanism of the magnitude 3.3 earthquake on 27 September 2021 and results from the previous study based on the temporary deployment in 2011–2012. In comparison, the magnitudes 3.1 and 2.0 events likely occur on a north–south-striking right-lateral strike-slip fault further north, indicating complex patterns of stress and faulting styles in the region.